Tagged: Y.A. RSS Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • johnmcusick 5:47 pm on November 3, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , profanity, purple prose, , , , Y.A.   

    Dirty, Pretty Thing: Purple and Blue Language in Y.A. 

    I’m a sucker for purple prose. I’m not proud of it, but alliteration makes me swoon, as does a prettily described sunset or milkmaid. (Some favorite examples appear in Proust’s Swann’s Way, a five-hundred-page book about a cookie). But my love of flowery language is, I think, just another symptom of English Major-itis: the desire to write and read Great Works of Art as opposed to Stories. And though they’re often fun to write, beautiful descriptions are best avoided, *especially* in young adult literature. Teens read for plot, not for prose. My 13-year-old sister and other teens I’ve spoken to skip the “boring parts,” which are almost always the descriptions. Descriptions are the icing, and if you’ve ever eaten a jar of icing on its own, you know it only feels good at first.

    On the other hand, teens love blue (profane or vulgar) language. (So do I.) It’s fun, funny, taboo, and often the way teenagers speak to one another. Raised by a mother who talks like a trucker, I have to check myself, when I speak and when I write, to ensure I don’t curse a…well, a blue streak. But fiction, and especially dialog, must be believable, which ironically is not always the same thing as true-to-life. At times “realistic’ teen dialog is so vulgar as to be distracting. And that’s the real problem with extreme language of any kind: it steals focus. I don’t want my readers thinking about my protagonist’s foul mouth when they should be thinking about her broken heart.

    Today I struggled to tamp both purple and blue. In the scene I was working on, my protagonist and her boyfriend slip into the bushes for some hanky-panky. My first impulse was to pan away and describe the slowly spinning wheel of boyfriend’s bike as it glints in the sun. Yawn. Turning focus back to the kids, I found myself using the same blue language the characters themselves would have used to describe their actions, but the result was too graphic. I settled for skipping the play-by-play entirely and used suggestive post-romp details instead. This was the result:

    They made it as far as Sweet Creek before a private path through the trees enticed them off the road. They let the bike fall with a crunch, the upended front wheel spinning freely. Twenty minutes later Cherry was brushing a mud stain from her slacks, and Lucas searched for his sock in the bushes.

                “You have leaves in your hair,” he said.

                “I have leaves everywhere.” She felt like a wild woods girl, a sprite. She wanted to climb into the nearest oak and fall asleep. She stretched, felt an ache above her solar plexus and winced.

     
    • Keisha 5:58 pm on November 3, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      Awesome, the manuscript I rewrote (yes the one I had sent you which was awful now I am loving the revamp novel ) a weird thing happened the MC swears a few times, that’s how she sounds in my mind but my editor tells me when I get too out of hand, I never ever use the F bomb douche is a huge word I use I just love the way it sounds lol but another thong I do is describing the setting i.e the blue sky, forest …zzzzzzzzzz, your so right teens are not interested in that so I too have tried to make it realistic to target market but still keep in mind it can’t get too racy, or poetic. I like your excerpt it offers the same post romp for sure is this the second book after GIRL PARTS? *SQUEE* if it is.

      • johnmcusick 6:04 pm on November 3, 2011 Permalink | Reply

        For examples of tasteful but unblushing love scenes in y.a., check out Pat Hughes’s fabulous OPEN ICE.

        And yep, this is from the follow-up :)

        • Keisha 1:23 am on April 30, 2012 Permalink

          LOL checking back on my comment I realized I said thong no it was thing yikes.

  • johnmcusick 4:25 pm on July 29, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Down Under Wonderings, , , Micro Synopsis Contest, Scott Treimel NY, Y.A., YATopia   

    Interview on Down Under Wonderings 

    As a run up to next week’s MICRO SYNOPSIS contest on YATopia, Down Under Wonderings asked me a few questions about agenting, writing, and why I love Y.A…

     

    3) What is the lure of YA for you?
    The codes of conduct, the struggles, the newness of everything: adolescence is so intense! Teenagers have a purity of focus. Whatever their struggle, whether finding a date to prom or defeating a dark wizard, they’re stepping into the world for the first time, discovering who they are in relationship to everything else. From the ages of 12 to 18 our brains draw and redraw a map of the universe with a big arrow labeled YOU ARE HERE. Teenagers become themselves. Combine all this with the very adult problems kids often face (drugs, abusive parents, dark wizards), and you have very rich ground for stories. And personally, I’m not sure if I ever really left high school. I still pass notes to girls I like.

     

    Read the whole thing here.

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
shift + esc
cancel
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,379 other followers